![model builder spatial analyst fails on python export model builder spatial analyst fails on python export](https://sites.google.com/a/udel.edu/jwolfin-apec480/_/rsrc/1432601112926/assignment-2/expansion_and_connectivity_big_explained.png)
- #MODEL BUILDER SPATIAL ANALYST FAILS ON PYTHON EXPORT UPGRADE#
- #MODEL BUILDER SPATIAL ANALYST FAILS ON PYTHON EXPORT CODE#
Remove them and replace them with specific error traps. Plain try/except blocks are not useful, they hide the error reporting. Recommendation: Leave the defaults empty if you are not changing it. MakeFeatureLayer does not need to spell out all the fieldmap if you are not modifying it. Recommendation: Don't use dBase tables or shapefiles for intermediate featureclasses. Workspaces should always be a file geodatabase for speed and better indexing, and no size limits. Temporary featureclasses do not need to be written to disk, you can use "in_memory" workspace.
![model builder spatial analyst fails on python export model builder spatial analyst fails on python export](https://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/chrome-suspicious-site-reporter-extension.png)
Recommendation: Replace multiple CalculateField steps with a single cursor and internal Python logic. Cursors are just as fast and can have a lot more logic built in to do more than one thing on a pass. Recommendation: Remove references to system toolboxes to save time and clutter.ĬalculateField is designed for ModelBuilder because cursors are not available. System toolboxes do not need to be added, only custom toolboxes not on the search path. Run it from a tool and check the box 'Run Python script in process' on the Source tab.You may not even need to refactor the code.
#MODEL BUILDER SPATIAL ANALYST FAILS ON PYTHON EXPORT UPGRADE#
Recommendation: Upgrade to 9.3 or 10.0, and run 'in process'. Things have moved on with Python now able to run inside the ArcGIS process at 9.3 and 10.0, avoiding creating a separate process for each tool. You say that you are using 9.3 but I see that the script is using ArcGIS 9.2. pair around your script (the # button on the toolbar) when posting it retains the indentation, otherwise we can't read it.) There is huge redundancy and repetition in it that is very inefficient scripting, but is Ok in ModelBuilder.
#MODEL BUILDER SPATIAL ANALYST FAILS ON PYTHON EXPORT CODE#
The Python code generated by Modelbuilder does not look like an analyst would code the problem. Gp.addmessage("Traitement des autres type non développé") Gp.SelectLayerByAttribute_management(Layer, "NEW_SELECTION", "\"dd\" =3") # Process: Select Layer By Attribute (3). Gp.CalculateField_management(Layer, "dd", "4", "PYTHON", "")
![model builder spatial analyst fails on python export model builder spatial analyst fails on python export](https://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/shopify-3d-models.jpg)
Gp.SelectLayerByAttribute_management(Layer, "NEW_SELECTION", "\"iddd\" = \"MAX_iddd\"") # Process: Select Layer By Attribute (2). Gp.CalculateField_management(Layer, "dd", "3", "PYTHON", "") Gp.SelectLayerByAttribute_management(Layer, "NEW_SELECTION", "\"FREQUENCY\" > 1") Gp.AddJoin_management(Layer, "AREA", doublon_stat_dbf, "AREA", "KEEP_ALL") Gp.Statistics_analysis(Layer, doublon_stat_dbf, "AREA COUNT iddd MAX", "AREA") Gp.CalculateField_management(Layer, "iddd", "!FID!", "PYTHON", "")Įxpression = "AREA", expression, "PYTHON", "") Gp.CalculateField_management(Layer, "dd", "0", "PYTHON", "") #,"", "", "FID_block9 FID_block9 VISIBLE NONE AREA AREA VISIBLE NONE PERIMETER PERIMETER VISIBLE NONE FMFOBJID FMFOBJID VISIBLE NONE POLYID POLYID VISIBLE NONE POLYTYPE POLYTYPE VISIBLE NONE YRSOURCE YRSOURCE VISIBLE NONE SOURCE SOURCE VISIBLE NONE FORMOD FORMOD VISIBLE NONE DEVSTAGE DEVSTAGE VISIBLE NONE YRDEP YRDEP VISIBLE NONE OYRORG OYRORG VISIBLE NONE OSPCOMP OSPCOMP VISIBLE NONE OLEADSPC OLEADSPC VISIBLE NONE OAGE OAGE VISIBLE NONE OHT OHT VISIBLE NONE OCCLO OCCLO VISIBLE NONE OSI OSI VISIBLE NONE OSC OSC VISIBLE NONE UYRORG UYRORG VISIBLE NONE USPCOMP USPCOMP VISIBLE NONE ULEADSPC ULEADSPC VISIBLE NONE UAGE UAGE VISIBLE NONE UHT UHT VISIBLE NONE UCCLO UCCLO VISIBLE NONE USI USI VISIBLE NONE USC USC VISIBLE NONE INCIDSPC INCIDSPC VISIBLE NONE VERT VERT VISIBLE NONE HORIZ HORIZ VISIBLE NONE PRI_ECO PRI_ECO VISIBLE NONE SEC_ECO SEC_ECO VISIBLE NONE ACCESS1 ACCESS1 VISIBLE NONE ACCESS2 ACCESS2 VISIBLE NONE MGMTCON1 MGMTCON1 VISIBLE NONE MGMTCON2 MGMTCON2 VISIBLE NONE MGMTCON3 MGMTCON3 VISIBLE NONE VERDATE VERDATE VISIBLE NONE SENSITIV SENSITIV VISIBLE NONE BED BED VISIBLE NONE STKG STKG VISIBLE NONE FID_index_ FID_index_ VISIBLE NONE OBJECT_ID OBJECT_ID VISIBLE NONE nom nom VISIBLE NONE BUFF_DIST BUFF_DIST VISIBLE NONE dd dd VISIBLE NONE racc racc VISIBLE NONE iddd iddd VISIBLE NONE") Gp.MakeFeatureLayer_management(fc, Layer) #Process the feature class attributes (worckspace)ĭoublon_stat_dbf = "C:\\Temp\\doublon_stat.dbf"Īll = != " _ "] Gp.AddToolbox("C:/Program Files/ArcGIS/ArcToolbox/Toolboxes/Analysis Tools.tbx")įc = string.replace(gp.getparameterastext(0),"\\","/")īlock9 = "block9" # provide a default value if unspecified Gp.AddToolbox("C:/Program Files/ArcGIS/ArcToolbox/Toolboxes/Data Management Tools.tbx") It is possible to increase performance of the script? they do the same thing and use the same tools(same geoprocessing tools) and the result is the same! I tried to modify the script to increase performance but no gains. The model takes 35 secondes to run and the python script takes 13 minutes to run.